Mechanized of Interlocking Brick and Its Structural Behaviour as Load Bearing and Non-Load Bearing Element-Review
- Interlocking brick,
- load bearing and non-load bearing
Copyright (c) 2019 International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Technovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Conventional bricks are the most elementary building materials for houses construction. However, the rapid growth in today's construction industry has obliged the civil engineers in searching for a new building technique that may result in even greater economy, more efficient and durable as an alternative for the conventional brick. Moreover, the high demands for having a speedy and less labour and cost building systems is one of the factor that cause the changes of the masonry conventional systems. These changes have led to improved constructability, performance, and cost as well. Several interlocking bricks has been developed and implemented in building constructions and a number of researches had studied the manufacturing of interlocking brick and its structural behaviour as load bearing and non-load bearing element. This technical paper aims to review the development of interlocking brick and its structural behaviour. In conclusion, the concept of interlocking system has been widely used as a replacement of the conventional system where it has been utilized either as load bearing or non-load bearing masonry system.
2. Allen E and Thallon R 2011 Fundamentals of residential construction (John Wiley & Sons)
3. Irwan J, Zamer M and Othman N 2016 A Review on Interlocking Compressed Earth Blocks (ICEB) with Addition of Bacteria MATEC Web of Conf.: EDP Sciences 0-5
4. Korany Y and Humphrey S 2010 Proc. of the 2nd Masonry Mini Symp
5. Anand K and Ramamurthy K 2005 Development and evaluation of hollow concrete interlocking block masonry system Masonry Soc. J. 23 11-9
6. Correia S L, Souza F L, Dienstmann G, Segadaes A M, ― Assessment of the recycling potential of fresh concrete waste using a factorial design of experiments‖, Waste Manage 2009; 29:2886-91.
7. Jain A K, ―Fly Ash Utilization in Indian Cement Industry: Current Status and Future Prospects‖, Indian Concrete Institute, an Electronic Bulletin, Vol. 2, Issue 2, Feb.2011.
8. R and D Proposals, Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India, December, 2012.
9. Uygunog˘lu T , Topcu I B, Gencel O, Brostow W, ―The effect of fly ash content and types of aggregates on the properties of pre-fabricated concrete interlocking blocks (PCIBs)‖, Construction and Building Materials 30 (2012) 180-187.
10. Dhadse S, Kumari P, Bhagia L J, ―Fly Ash Characterization, Utilization and Government Initiatives in India- A Review‖, Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, Vol. 67, January 2008, 11-18.
11. Y. M. Adedeji, "Interlocking masonry: Panacea for sustainable low-cost housing in Nigeria,” Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 744-750, 2008.
12. H. G. Harris, K. H. Oh and A. A. Hamid, "Development of new interlocking and mortarless block masonry units for efficient building system," in Proceedings of 6th Masonry Symposium, Saskatchewan, Canada, 1992.
13. M. P. Amado, A. J. Pinto and C. V. Santos, "The sustainable building process," in Proceedings of XXXV IAHS World Congress on Housing Science, Melbourne, Australia, 2007.
14. D. Chwieduk, "Towards sustainable energy buildings," Applied Energy, vol. 76, pp. 211-217, 2003.
15. M. Calkins, Materials for sustainable sites: a complete guide to the evaluation, selection and use of sustainable construction materials, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.